![]() ![]() If the artist does not translate the subject completely, then the work must somehow not be completely the artist’s interpretation of the subject. Instead, they are simply transferred to a surface.īecause the artist did not translate the observed contour lines, some believe that this is cheating. When the artist traces, the translation of the lines are not made by the artist. Tracing is not the path the artist should take if improving drawing skills is the desired result.Īrgument #2 – When you learn to draw, you learn to observe and translate what you observe into lines, shapes, values, textures, etc. Tracing does not directly improve our observational drawing skills. When the artist traces the subject, this process of improving is hindered. As we practice, the accuracy of the marks that we make improve and our drawings become more precise. This process requires practice and trial and error. We learn to see as artists and make marks to reflect what we observe. Why is it that these folks believe that tracing is cheating?Īrgument #1 – Learning to draw requires the refinement of observation skills. Let’s first examine the opinion of those in the “cheating” camp. ![]() Are all of these artists “cheaters”? Is It Cheating To Trace? It is used by more artists than you may realize. Tracing or transferring images has been a technique used by artists throughout the years to save time and ensure accuracy in representational art. Some feel that it’s actually “cheating” to transfer or trace contour lines onto a canvas or a drawing surface. Some are very passionate and vocal about their feelings. ![]() So, it’s no wonder that creative people are opinionated.Īnd when it comes to tracing or transferring images, every artist has an opinion on whether or not it’s appropriate to do so. Passionate people are usually opinionated people. Creative people are usually passionate people. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |